SMEs must play an important role and position in China's economic structure. Take official data as an example. Mid-line companies contribute 60% of the economy and 80% of employment creation in China. In fact, with the continuous adjustment of the economic structure, as well as the de-capacity and supply-side reforms, the difficulties and pressures of the mid-line enterprise annuities continue to rise. The "funding is difficult to finance" has long restricted the development of SMEs.

Taking 16-17 years of “de-capacity” and “environmental protection” and “supply-side reform” as examples, the large-scale closure of the farm economy such as chemical, steel and pig raising has seriously affected “employment” to a large extent. the result of.

It should be clearly pointed out that "grasping the environment" and "de-capacity" and "supply-side reform" are all imperative national policies. This is no problem. A large number of small and medium-sized enterprises grow wildly, pollute the environment, and have poor quality. The shoddy charge has seriously disrupted and affected the long-term health and stability of many industries. Taking steel and chemical industry as an example, the national industry has been in a long-term downturn, and enterprises have suffered large losses. The phenomenon that “one ton of steel profits is not as good as one pound of cabbage” has long existed. Therefore, from the perspective of de-capacity, supply-side reform and environmental protection, it is imperative!

In terms of pork prices, the results of the “farm” pig raising model in previous years have indeed caused serious shortages of pork, superimposed on the impact of “African swine fever”, and now there is a serious imbalance between supply and demand in the pig industry.

Then, from the root causes and results, the contradiction between de-capacity, supply-side reform and environmental protection, and the large number of SMEs shut down, resulting in employment pressure is a phased problem and contradiction, or a problem caused by long-term barbaric growth and contradiction?

From the perspective of national industry, SMEs are gradually benefiting from the gradual withdrawal of “low-end”, “pollution” and decentralized operations, which will continue to transform and upgrade the country’s industrial structure. Only SMEs should seek breakthroughs in the direction of finding an industry that suits them, such as e-commerce, rural markets and agricultural products, as well as auxiliary processing and manufacturing and assembly of some large enterprises. In the introduction of knowledge structure, the introduction of technical equipment, objectively, there is a resonance - the resonance of the national industrial upgrading and transformation and the pain of SMEs.

In the future, this "pain" and "transformation" will exist for a long time. Is this possible to confront and transfer with human will? However, the localities should give time, give credit support, give certain financial subsidies, and give full consideration to the impact and impact of employment in the transformation of SMEs. Reduce the taxes and fees of small and medium-sized enterprises, and appropriately give SMEs the “best-effort treatment” to help SMEs transform and survive the transitional period of suffering.

Is it more difficult to work in the future? Definitely. It is more and more difficult to work in the form of “simple manual labor and “migrant workers” in the form of “production line assembly”. This also encourages people to improve their knowledge structure through study, through study, and through higher education. The social structure, the future industry is no longer represented by the “migrant workers” during the “demographic dividend” period, and must be represented by the new employment opportunities during the “engineer bonus” period.

In the face of the “upgrade and transformation” of the country and small and medium-sized enterprises, how can you, as a working-class person, stay out of the way and not actively change their knowledge structure and social structure?